Thursday, January 22, 2009

‘Ron Paul on the Federal Crime Called the Fiat Dollar’

By LewRockwell ∙ LRC Blog ∙ January 22, 2009



  1. Hi, have you seen this:

    Here are the relevent passages:

    Ron Paul, Interviewed by Glenn Beck on Fox News Channel, January 21, 2009

    In this dynamic and engaging conversation, both Congressman Ron Paul and Fox News anchor Glenn Beck refuse to draw the blatantly obvious conclusions from their own analysis. So, even though they both predict the collapse of the dollar due to its deliberate and systematic dilution, 70% since October 2008, and its eventual replacement with a new global currency and new monetary system which they project to be based on gold, they refuse to see this path as the devilishly premeditated plan for global currency, nor divulge the fact that the bulk of the world's gold supply is now held in the hands of the same International banking cartel and their surrogates like Barrick Gold.

    Are Glenn Beck and Ron Paul so intelligence-challenged to not recognize the multivariate criminal sting operations under manufacture that will soon acquire an unbreakable stranglehold upon the entire world? Or are they simply astute enough to understand the permissible envelop of discourse so that crucial omissions are their life-vests as they pseudo-challenge the conventional mainstream wisdom in the lofty guise of dissent?

    Why do they project, in effect, that the bankers are morons, the Congress is irresponsible, and that this is all just sheer recklessness which if not checked will crash the dollar? Why don't they instead, blanketly and correctly assert that the Congress and the Executive are both beholden to the banksters and in on the scam, and that this path is a criminal premeditation, a monstrous conspiracy on the part of the globalists to create a 'one-world' government? That its sine qua non is the control and consolidation of the world's monetary system into one set of elitist financial hands? That the global hijacking of world's money supply will once again be suitably camouflaged just as the Federal Reserve System was in 1913 – setting it up as a partnership between the private banking cartel and the government, with the government having only insubstantial and ineffectual powers?

    Congressman Ron Paul continually resists the temptation of putting his trigger-finger on these crimes against humanity as an inside job! Watch him do his repeat performance also with respect to 911 and the manufactured 'war on terror', as merely the blowback of a reckless foreign policy rather than an inside job with a fabricated enemy, in this 'Open Letter to Ron Paul's supporters'. Half-truths, like half-doctors, have rarely if ever accurately diagnosed, let alone cured, any disease except through the sheer 'luck of the Irish'. And the world is running rather short of leprechauns right now. Half-truths can only lead to absurdities, like a yogi sitting cross-legged on his rump in the Hindu Kush and armed to the teeth only with secure cellphones and laptops, bringing down the mightiest sole-superpower in the history of mankind while demolishing its three tall buildings into fine rubble, all from his reclusive hideout! Ron Paul perpetuates this absurdity to the blazing accolades of his fawning followers. And more importantly, to the convenience of maintaining the sacred-cow axioms of the establishment.


    Listening to Ron Paul, one can't help but reach the conclusion that he holds himself back deliberately from unraveling the whole truth, and instead deliberately retains the core-axioms of empire, rather than merely inadvertently doing so. His eager followers don't seem to want to analyze his speak to any level of depth, for his mesmerizing telling of partial truths, in an era of all lies and deception, seems revolutionary to many.

    I would be very interested in both Dr. Ron Paul as well as his thinking fans coherently and convincingly responding to the critique in the above Jan 2009 report on Financial Terrorism, and in the open letter which it cites.

    In any event, Manufacturing Dissent is as critical a function in the West for its ruling-elite, as Manufacturing Consent. And both have to be understood in order to appreciate how "they" get away with it! It is examined here:

    Thank you.

    Zahir Ebrahim

    P.S. Thank you for leaving very encouraging comments on Project website.

  2. Hey, thanks. Not yet, but I have now, and I must say it is nicely put forth. It presupposes that Ron Paul has solid proof of illicit intent on the bad guys' part, though. He typically brushes off the chance to publicly call people out on their intentions, but he goes beyond that: he irrefutably and ceaselessly argues for the disappearance of the very entities and systems that produce and enrich the very people whose malignant motives you and I (and Ron Paul) may be convinced of. I, personally, wanted to see him more active toward Cheney & Bush impeachment. He followed constitutional norms (like not voting with his fellow Reps just to patronize D. Kucinich, Dem), and was not averse to the impeachment procedings themselves; still, I felt he could have used some of his floor time to argue specifically for it. R. Paul circles the earth showing us why the bad guys and their systems and vehicles should be replaced or just gone. But as for outing folks for their criminal intent, that's a whole other level. If he had some hard proof of malicious motive to juxtapose with his irrefutable evidence of damage done, I'd hope that he would act accordingly.